March 25, 2004
Missile Matters

While I'm pretty sure this Wired bit about "how to avoid a heat seeking missile" is somewhat tounge-in-cheek, it does have some very valid points. It also, however, misses an equal number.

Caveat: I am not a missileer, nor am I a pilot. What follows is what I've gathered through decades of reading military hardware specs (in my spare time, for fun, yes, I'm really that weird), and fighting against these things in various hyper-accurate simulators:

Fun facts you may not know about missiles meant to knock down planes:

  • Anti-air missiles, at least the sort that terrorists would use to take a shot at airliners (called "manpads"), are primarily designed to destroy helicopters and single-seat fighters. They have relatively small warheads, usually less than 60 pounds worth of explosives. Compare this with the "small" 500 pound bombs normally used to plink tanks and the "large" 2000 pound bombs used to knock down bridges.
  • Manpads are designed to work in comparatively narrow launch envelopes, and are quite limited in range. Even the nasty ones are limited to about a two miles, but are usually really effective at only half that distance.
  • While this may seem an awfully long distance, it's important to remember modern jetliners actually move pretty fast, and cover that fairly rapidly even at normal speeds. It also means airliners are vulnerable to these things only during takeoff and landing, very close to the airport.
  • As noted above, these missiles are designed to neutralize comparatively small targets. That's neutralize, not destroy. While nasty indeed against helicopters, it's quite common for even small fighters to fly home after being hit with one of these things.
  • A jetliner, being several orders of magnitude larger than a fighter, is much more likely to simply absorb the damage one of these systems does and keep going, at least long enough to make an emergency landing.

Are manpads still a danger to airliners? Absolutely. An airplane is not a tank, it is light and finely engineered and not good at being bounced around or having holes punched in it. However, a large civil airliner is probably one of the aircraft most likely to survive an encounter with a manpad.

Bottom line: yes, they're a threat, but not a big enough one to keep me from flying.

Posted by scott at March 25, 2004 10:03 AM

eMail this entry!
Comments

Ah, but you're not the one flying to the DC area in a couple of weeks. Maybe the BWI area will be safer. I hope so. lol

Posted by: Pat on March 25, 2004 12:54 PM

Pat - no need to worry. Airplanes are held together with aluminum rivets. Pound for pound, stronger than steel and very absorbant as far as damage is concerned. Plus, it gets harder the more its stressed (at least initially), so that'd help get you down in one piece.

Also, if you're flying into Dulles or Reagan, it isn't too bad - there aren't many secluded places where someone could let one loose at an airliner.

Posted by: Ron on March 25, 2004 06:48 PM

So glad you and Scott feel safe and secure flying! I repeat I am the one up in that big old bird. LOL Just kidding, it would take more than a threat to keep me from seeing my babies.

Posted by: Pat on March 26, 2004 09:09 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?